abcnews.go.com/2020/GiveMeABreak/story
A great article on the Wage Gap Myth from the latest episode of 20/20. Apparently the story on TV was more in depth, but I didn't hear about it until after it had aired. Oh well.
Anyone read Farrell's latest book, the one featured in the article? If so, what did you think of it?
A great article on the Wage Gap Myth from the latest episode of 20/20. Apparently the story on TV was more in depth, but I didn't hear about it until after it had aired. Oh well.
Anyone read Farrell's latest book, the one featured in the article? If so, what did you think of it?
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Thu, June 2, 2005 - 3:41 PMI'm pretty sure it's a little from column A, a little from column B. Women often DO get paid less in the same position, and I've never before heard about the disparity in hrs. worked, but this seems probable.
Some factors that the article neglected to mention is that women are usually less aggressive when negotiating salary contracts - are more likely to accept the first offer. Thus, employers take advantage of this - essentially that's not discrimination, but just business.
Also, and to what extent this is taken into account I'm not sure, but so many women work part-time or not at all when their kids are young that by the time they're middle-aged they are lacking seniority as compared to their male counterparts. -
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Thu, June 2, 2005 - 5:56 PMYes, from what I've read about Warren Farrell's new book (the topic of the 20/20 story), he covers all these topics. I'll buy the book before long, and write a review here when I'm done reading it.
If you haven't read his books, I highly recommend "The Myth of Male Power." It exposes a lot of the ways men get the "short end of the stick" in society that most people either refuse to acknowledge or outright lie about. My favorite part of the book was about the justice system in the USA. He really covered that topic well, and brought lots of research, statistical analysis and data to back up his assertions. One of my favorite books about men's rights....
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Sun, June 5, 2005 - 8:43 PM<...but so many women work part-time or not at all when their kids are young that by the time they're middle-aged they are lacking seniority as compared to their male counterparts.>
Not just part time or not at all, but in most families, it is the mother that "pinch hits" when kids need it. So maybe mom works full-time, but she calls in sick to take care of sick kids, doesn't work late so she can get them from daycare, etc. Well that behavior doesn't get you on the fast track for promotions. And while those are valid choices to make, it's not fair to make those choices and then say 'but men make more!'.
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 12:53 PM<Some factors that the article neglected to mention is that women are usually less aggressive when negotiating salary contracts - are more likely to accept the first offer. Thus, employers take advantage of this - essentially that's not discrimination, but just business.>
I totally agree with this. -
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Tue, June 7, 2005 - 1:14 PMI've witnessed it. Many times.
I used to be one of the folks who would just accept any offer. Ironically, perhaps, it was my sister (a godlike negotiator) who taught me not to do that, and how to negotiate the best terms when getting hired.
After her advice, and the advice and coaching of some other fine folks as well.... I had another job interview. I went in there, and half way through the job description (they're explaining their game plan and why they need someone with my skills on a whiteboard), I get up, seize control of the meeting, and explain to them why 25% of their plans won't work, and what they need to change to make them work.
Well, needless to say, they were impressed.
The guy doing the hiring asked at the end of the meeting how much I wanted. I said, without any hesitation, $55,000. He replied, "well, HR only gave me permission to hire someone on the spot for $40,000, so I'll have to talk to them and get back to you."
This would have been the point that I would normally have either accepted the 40k, or asked for 45k and gotten it. Instead, I said, "well, I'll just thank you for your time then, and be on my way. Get back to me with the results of your conversation with the HR people. And, just to let you know, in case it has any bearing on your decision.... I made $50k in my last job, and I'm more talented now, and will be taking on more responsibility in your position, so I deserve a raise from my last job. I know what I'm worth in this industry, and if you're not interested in hiring me for $55k, I can understand that completely, but will be unlikely to entertain that offer seriously. Of course, if you have another offer, I'm willing to listen, but like I said, won't be all that likely to accept it."
This, of course, was a total lie. I was telling the truth about my previous salary...but my responsibility level was only going up on paper...not in practice...and I'd actually be doing less work than before. Realistically, I would have accepted $45k if they came back and they said that's the best they could do. I really needed the job pretty bad to make ends meet.
So. I shake the guy's hand, and leave. I'm out the door, into the parking lot, and half way to my car when he comes running up behind me. "Evan! Wait. Hold up a minute." I stop. He comes over and says, "Screw HR. You're hired for $55k. Can you start on Monday?"
Now, while I was in this position, I hired a bunch of people, and was present for the hiring of many others. And what I noticed was that about 8 in 10 men attempted to negotiate a better deal than the initial offer, and only about 1 in 10 women did. This struck me as rather odd, seeing as the bulk of my salary negotiation skills came from my sister. Nevertheless...it is what it is...we could usually hire the women for our first offer. Some of the men we let walk cause we simply wouldn't accept anything close to their demands....
-
-
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 11:38 AMHere's a fun bubble to bust. I worked harder and more efficiently than 99% of the men I EVER worked with. I applied myself to my work, and I did it better than most.
I never got promoted, ever. I watched (this is not a joke or an exxageration) the 'good 'ol boys' promote each other and give each other raises for giving me more work.
I changed jobs because I didn't like it. Everywhere I went it was like that. The same job, the same experience, better work, no "baby" breaks. I always made less. Even when I was spending 90% of my time teaching the idiots who just got promoted, how to do their job, that they then would just say "Hey Talena, since you're so good at this.....".
Now I've been out of work for 2 years, I expect to re-enter the field making less than men and women both for my age and skillset. But I can pretty much guarantee you even when I prove myself to be a more valuable employee, I will not be treated as such.
Seriously, you all can go on and on about this "myth" all you want. And I grew up in Washington, and have spent the last 7 years in California. I'm back in Washington for the last two weeks now. These are not "backwater" states. It's not a myth. And I changed jobs so many times trying to find better treatment it started to look bad on applications. I was just fortunate that even while they refused to promote me or give me a raise or treat me "equal" to their "buddy buddies" they weren't hesitant to give me awesome references.
-
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 12:35 PMAnd if you received less pay and got repeatedly passed over for promotions despite providing equal work, then you had a case for a discrimination lawsuit. Why didn't you file one?
I don't disagree that discrimination occurs. And when it does, people should file a lawsuit.
What I contend, as does Farrell, is that the whole issue has been "mythologized" by the feminist movement, and that the mythical image they portray has little to do with the actual facts. Additionally, that the image they portray is one of commonplace discrimination by men against women in the workplace.
While your experience in your chosen career may have been one of unequal pay in favor of men, my experience was of equal pay 90% of the time, and when the pay was unequal, it was more frequently the woman making more than the other way around.
And, when the statistical data get analyzed in a more fair and impartial manner than provided by gender feminists, they show the same thing...most commonly people being paid the same thing for the same job...and where disparity exists, it sometimes favors men and sometimes favors women.
Here's the thing, Talena.... While you may have had bad experiences, and I'm sure you're being honest here...that does not mean that your experience is the universal experience for women.
As I said, everywhere I've worked, people were paid the same if their job description, number of hours worked, and level of expertise were the same. I know, because I always asked the unthinkable question that we aren't supposed to ask of our coworkers, and our job contracts say we cannot ask: "how much do you make?" And I mostly got answers from most people. And women weren't shy about sharing the info. They wanted to trade the info to find out if they were being discriminated against. -
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 1:38 PMI can accept it may not be universal, I've yet to discover anything that really was, but I put a lot of effort into finding an environment that wasn't, and I never found one. So it can't be that RARE.
About the only consistent thing in some places were starting wages. After that women got the shaft.
Except for the one with very large breasts, who was dumb as a bat, but hey, she was the managers girlfriend.
Why didn't I file a lawsuit?
I didn't have the money and I'm not the personality type for a lawsuit. I just keep trying to prove myself. I'd rather win by merit than by attorney.
To use one company I worked for longest as example, the one with the big breasts actually. That company was owned by a very rich, judges son. It had been sued and sued and even invaded by SWAT once guns pointed at employees and everything. And it's attorneys beat everything.
You think I really stood a chance? -
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 2:08 PMMay I ask what type of work you do?
Talena: "So it can't be that RARE."
How many jobs have you had? I'm guessing the sample we're looking at here is under 25 companies, correct?
How many companies are there in the USA?
Here's where I have the beef, Talena: Does the amount of companies actually participating in true wage discrimination based on sex, race and other birth-group factors fall closer to the "rare" or the "commonplace" mark?
The gender feminists at NOW and other such organizations would have us believe "commonplace" is the answer. I think the BLS and Census data shows that "rare" is the answer.
Do some companies discriminate and give unequal pay for equal work? Absolutely.
Does a vast "patriarchal" conspiracy exist among corporations to pay women less than men? Is the practice commonplace? It sure doesn't seem so based on the majority of statistics and scientific reasearch I've seen on the topic. -
-
Re: Wage Gap Myth - Exposed on 20/20
Mon, June 6, 2005 - 5:45 PMYes under 25, but I'm not going to count on my fingers because I don't have the time, somewhere I have a resume if it's easy enough to find I'll give a specific number.
I've ranged from carpentry, to data entry, to reception, to I.T. (least difference in this field in my experience), administrative, research and development, product development, customer service, sales, accounting, theres more, but again, I'm not going to waste time trying to remember.
I'm also not saying there is a DELIBERATE effort to not pay women equal. I don't think it's a conspiracy. It just IS.
I believe it is commonplace. But I'd also be the first to bet that companies dominated by women, women owners, management, etc, probably pay women more than they pay men.
Not because they have some plan to pay them less, just because they are more likely to hire "like" people. They like themselves and they hire and promote themselves.
I don't care what feminists say about anything. I'm sharing the reality of my experience with you.
And the research I've seen, doesn't support your claim. So that's a matter of what you've looked for or been exposed to.
-
-
-
-
